|
PBA Hall Of Fame: Ernie SchlegelYear Inducted: 1997
Ernie Schlegel was one of the top, most famous, most successful action bowlers of all time... He was also one of the most controversel action bowlers...
There was plenty of action at Inwood, but it was a small house, and it's action days coincided with the action at Gun Post, which was THE action house in the sixties in the Bronx, so the action wasn't as often at Inwood as it would have been. Yes, plenty of people came to Inwood to bowl Ernie Shlegel , and most of them ended up wishing they hadn't. The problem for them was that Ernie was practically unbeatable down there. First of all, Chris Kourabas, who owned Inwood, would let Ernie practice all day long for free, and he did. Secondly, the shot at Inwood might as well have been designed for Ernie, because he threw a full roller, practically a straight ball, and he was very accurate. A shooter throwing a big hook would struggle, while Ernie would just go straight up and in just a little. Inwood was in Washington Heights, just across the bridge from the Bronx, near Dykeman and Broadway, Academy Street. Harry Bar, on this web site, used to have his pro shop at Inwood. As for Ernie's ball, I could never understand how he could beat the top guns. But actually the truth is that throwing a full roller straight up and in is one of the best balls that anyone can throw - IF - and I say ONLY IF - you are incredibly, unbelievably accurate on every shot, because there is no room whatsoever for error. If you are not dead perfect in the pocket, you will never carry the five. When you throw a big hook, even if you're a little light, you can still strike with a mixer, or, more often, if you have enough ball, you will strike with a sweeper, where the five takes out the seven. But Ernie never threw a sweeper in his life, for the reason I stated above - if he was light he could never carry the five. The only way he ever struck on a light hit was with a mixer, what he called "scrambled eggs." So if you throw that kind of ball and line, you have to be perfect. The thing was that when he was on, Ernie usually WAS perfect, so when he was on, he could beat anybody. I never really thought Ernie was throwing a load, though I wouldn't put it past many of the guys those days. Really, a load wouldn't do a whole lot of good for a shooter throwing that kind of line, though it certainly couldn't hurt any. It was the guys throwing the big hooks that sometimes used a load, though someone like Ralph never needed to, because he had a ton of ball already. The one guy who ALWAYS threw a load was Iggy Russo, and still he generally got beaten by the real top guns. Iggy Russo was sleazy and I wouldn't put anything past him.
I would have to say that the biggest success story of a guy
who was just a hustler has to be Ernie Schlegel. He really never worked except
here and there for a bowling alley and only so he could practice for free. He's
come a long way from his modest beginnings as a janitor's son.
Berardi did better in the pro's but Ernie is by
far the better action bowler. Joey bowled some action but not a lot. He joined
the pro's at a very young age. Remember there is quite a bit of oil on the pro
tour and Ernie never threw a lot of ball so it was much tougher for him to carry.
There aren't many guys around who are as accurate as Ernie and if he could carry
like some of the others he would have been SUPER TOUGH on tour.
also i was very close friends with the horn and joe s and both also agree
ernie was a tough match now in my opinion ernie had the heart of a lion. i never
saw him in the sixties but the seventy's he was still tough. the man could go
down and in better than anyone . plus he had charisma. when i went on tour I had
red white and blue linds made for me just like ernies in 1976. the problem with
most posts on this site is the newcomers have little or no respect for the
oldtimers. I have gotten alot of trash from a few people on this site but there
were few people that could throw a bowling ball like I could high track with
alot of revs with a perfect approach and the 1st bowler with a high backswing.
Dear Stevie,
Ernie is bowling Mike Chuchillo from Patchogue one night at central. Nothing less than 240 for Ernie the first six and wins them all. the next game, he needs a mark in the tenth. he missed the head pin, left the 124 and then missed it to the left. Ernie came back laughing. The next game 240 plus, match over. he never went into his pocket for the game he lost.
ExAlleyRat, come on, Ernie was smart not a crook. He would bet only 20 and
lose, then freeze out the back, bet big and win. That's different that taking
the money and not betting it. Most of it was just feeling out the pair and his
opponent until he was confident.
lenny,how's the buff doing these days.FRUIT SALAD. I check out the action
bowlers site every once in awhile and have to laugh about the things they say
about who was the best.mike was good, so was ritchie and ralph dewey jake kenny
joe s,kidder but who went home with the money was the best and you know and for
sure i know ,that when you don't know when to quit that makes you a slight Fish
not a tuna because all of these mentioned could bowl. Enough said about bowlihg.
if you here from buff tell him i said hello. www.tournament 900@aol.com,you got
married and i didn't get an invite HA,HA looking at another site i seen red
bassetts name he was blinder than a bat but could hit a gnats ass at 40ft.haven't
heard his name in at least 15,20 yrs. brings back the memories of good times and
good action and the sun coming up and time to go home and sleep. bowl on the old
mans tour now just won my first title in brentwood (northern)ca. still bowling
and beating the kids on the regional level(just finished 2nd) hope to do the
same on the jr. tour this winter starting in jan.say hello to all my critics on
the net that think the other guys were the best just tell them whose still here
doing it and who is not that should prove that my knowledge and skill is beyond
theirs, rubber,plastic,soaker,bleeders,lt48's urathane ,2piece 3 piece and now
the load as I call them,getting better with age,the modern era the old era
whatever action is action when to get on a lane and when to get off is the sign
of who the best is not some one who lets himself get beat to the tune of all his
money thats a fish,tuna,and more then 5 in a row more then once is the ultimate
WHALE you chase them with a passion. now that the record is set to the cane who
does alot of the reporting to the action people,each person that said they made
alot of money on me in the middle that is not true I took all bets and my memory
is good,exact dates not so sharp on but matches right on win or lose,i never
lost to ritchie, twice to mike in singles,but never lost in doubles and that was
a whole bunch of times. when mike and i were partners we were unbeatable then he
listened to his so called friends and said you want to bowl me and that was his
downfall,i'm into making money not beating someone just taking their money. I
didn't like taking mikes money but his buddys now that was a different story.
Stevie Wonder is right. Ernie was the smartest especially when he was dumping. How many times he collected from the back, never bet a dime, did not put all in the middle and threw the game. I was in Central throughout the mid-late 60's and at GunPost before that. Ernie was the smartest action bowler period. Most guys were all ego, swagger and talk. It was a show. Ernie was always thinking.
to ernie or sicle street you were tough always and when i knew you , when i went on tour you still had game. you could bowl on most conditions becouse you were accurate . i also agree that most action bowlers including myself were gamblers and always wanted more and never knew when to quit. I remember pappas betting me in N.C once that i could not shoot 220 and i beat him 3 straight. he quit so i said how about 230 he said 235 i won the first lost 4 straight and ended up 100 dollars down. you gotta know when to hold em and pete mylenki could bowl,ernie and pete bowled mike and tom betucci on 37&38 in central and cleaned their clock,they also on another nite bowled ralph& doc iandolli and each game came down to the tenth and pete was like ice, what made ernie the best was he knew talent and when a match was in his favor,what made mike,richie, and quite a few others not as good(i didn't say talent)the never knew when to quit or if they had the best of the match they just wanted to bowl ernie was there for the kill and each time he bowled with pete they won. pete on the other hand was just like mike and richie,but the best was ralph ,ernie beat him 3 times ralph beat him 2 times,but you ask him today and he'll tell you ralph, not mike or ritchie,or anybody else............period......the best.....
this thread brings back some great memories I'm 59 years old now and Iget chills reading all these stories one of the best matches I ever saw was Jack Clemente and Ernie Schlegel against Ralph Engan and John Juni at the hub in Nyack,NY jack and ernie cleaned them out I remember the last game the owner of theHub took the money from all the registers in the house , the front desk,the bar and the snack bar Jack and Ernie put the game out of the wood in the ninth frame. When we came back to Glenwood Jack bought breakfast for all of us. what memories
Senior Citizen:
Glad to have you aboard. We have exactly the same background
and memories. Especially about Gun Post. It was THE PLACE for sure. If you check
back to the earlier posts in this section, you'll see a bunch from JK and Stevie
Wonder. That was my name on the board up to last year when I changed it to
HarryBar.
Well I guess you don't remember much. Ralph won three titles and lemon was on tour for ten years and probably the only bowler voted into the HOF with only 6 titles. Probably because he won two majors in one year. Schlegel was a great action bowler as most know and absolutely better than Ralph in action. Only the Horn and Lemon were better.
The NYC Bowling Association Hall of Fame Dinner was packed
last night with about 200 people. Ernie accepted with a terriffic and funny
speech. His daughter flew up from Florida and his sister and brother in law came
down from upstate NY along with Cathy's family members.
Ernie, not many guys have the great action stories you have,
your nic should be Mr. Action.
You are wrong about Ernie. He often bet way more than $100.
Especially when he was "sure" he'd win.
Probably not. However, if the bets had been as big, as when
the horn and lemon were at their best, I'm sure they would have each bet 1000s.
These guys would at times bet 1g out of the box when 100 was a nice bet.
Schlegel, doc, etc. rarely bet more than 100. The horn was in Vegas one year in
the late sixties on tour and Burton challenged him to a three game total wood
for 1g. richie said that he only bet one game at a time and challenged him for
10g. Burton flew the coop.
Louis,
ernie fruit salad schlagel yea that fits. ernie 61 now wow but mentally still 21 i'll bet. give ernie a tough shot that hooked and he would str8 ball you to death. he probobly hooks it now with this new crap. ernie and salvino 2 biggest characters the tour had. at least when i was bowling. i crossed with him in a house that was built in 3 different decades. 3 differant shots. ernie up 10 all 3 parts of the house.when he was on he could hit a toothpick longways. with this resin stuff his ball probably finishes strong now, that makes him tough still !!!!!!!! ernie say hi to cathy and i hope you are well... Louis Capasso
Awhile back Mineralite asked me if Ernie would show up for his
induction into the NY Bowling Hall of Fame.
When Ernie started bowling action he used to yell" "Scrambled
eggs" on very light hits that carried.
Billy,thanks for the kind words and great post.
This is to Vito D.
i was very close friends with the horn and joe s and both also agree ernie
was a tough match now in my opinion ernie had the heart of a lion. i never saw
him in the sixties but the seventy's he was still tough. the man could go down
and in better than anyone . plus he had charisma. when i went on tour I had red
white and blue linds made for me just like ernies in 1976. the problem with most
posts on this site is the newcomers have little or no respect for the oldtimers.
I have gotten alot of trash from a few people on this site but there were few
people that could throw a bowling ball like I could high track with alot of revs
with a perfect approach and the 1st bowler with a high backswing.
Dear Ernie I have bowled with you on tour and thank god never against you in a match you ARE a tough bowler and one of my idols. nuff said ... Lou C
Does anybody know that Schlegel is blind in one eye? Reason for not being a cranker.
Dear Stevie,
I know Ernie never threw a load like many. Stevie, was he right about this guy BELL crushing Ernie? Biggest load I saw was a guy named Mario who came to Central quite often. His ball weighed at least 18 pounds. One night the lanes were hooking so much that he had alot of trouble keeping the ball on the right side. We were cracking up in the back. Another guy Joe Leggett from Lyons Lanes in the 70s threw a load and never denied it. He was tough. Try getting him into a match with a legal ball. Impossible. Iggy Russo threw a load many times, although he did not need it. Former Action Bowler, the "Bell" was Johnny Bell a real good lefty who threw
a ton of ball.
Anyone who ever saw Ernie knows his whole game was being accurate. You couldn't be accurate with a loaded ball in the 60's because we used to put lead or mercury in and had no idea of what would happen when we threw it. It was more for fun than serious bowliing. Ernie is bowling Mike Chuchillo from Patchogue one night at central. Nothing less than 240 for Ernie the first six and wins them all. the next game, he needs a mark in the tenth. he missed the head pin, left the 124 and then missed it to the left. Ernie came back laughing. The next game 240 plus, match over. he never went into his pocket for the game he lost.
ExAlleyRat, come on, Ernie was smart not a crook. He would bet only 20 and
lose, then freeze out the back, bet big and win. That's different that taking
the money and not betting it. Most of it was just feeling out the pair and his
opponent until he was confident.
lenny,how's the buff doing these days.FRUIT SALAD. I check out the action
bowlers site every once in awhile and have to laugh about the things they say
about who was the best.mike was good, so was ritchie and ralph dewey jake kenny
joe s,kidder but who went home with the money was the best and you know and for
sure i know ,that when you don't know when to quit that makes you a slight Fish
not a tuna because all of these mentioned could bowl. Enough said about bowlihg.
if you here from buff tell him i said hello. www.tournament 900@aol.com,you got
married and i didn't get an invite HA,HA looking at another site i seen red
bassetts name he was blinder than a bat but could hit a gnats ass at 40ft.haven't heard his name in at least 15,20
yrs. brings back the memories of
good times and good action and the sun coming up and time to go home and sleep.
bowl on the old mans tour now just won my first title in brentwood (northern)ca.
still bowling and beating the kids on the regional level(just finished 2nd) hope
to do the same on the jr. tour this winter starting in jan.say hello to all my
critics on the net that think the other guys were the best just tell them whose
still here doing it and who is not that should prove that my knowledge and skill
is beyond theirs, rubber,plastic,soaker,bleeders,lt48's urathane ,2piece 3 piece
and now the load as I call them,getting better with age,the modern era the old
era whatever action is action when to get on a lane and when to get off is the
sign of who the best is not some one who lets himself get beat to the tune of
all his money thats a fish,tuna,and more then 5 in a row more then once is the
ultimate WHALE you chase them with a passion. now that the record is set to the
cane who does alot of the reporting to the action people,each person that said
they made alot of money on me in the middle that is not true I took all bets and
my memory is good,exact dates not so sharp on but matches right on win or lose,i
never lost to ritchie, twice to mike in singles,but never lost in doubles and
that was a whole bunch of times. when mike and i were partners we were
unbeatable then he listened to his so called friends and said you want to bowl
me and that was his downfall,i'm into making money not beating someone just
taking their money. I didn't like taking mikes money but his buddys now that was
a different story.
Stevie Wonder is right. Ernie was the smartest especially when he was dumping. How many times he collected from the back, never bet a dime, did not put all in the middle and threw the game. I was in Central throughout the mid-late 60's and at GunPost before that. Ernie was the smartest action bowler period. Most guys were all ego, swagger and talk. It was a show. Ernie was always thinking.
Sickle St. still have my red Jubilere? to ernie or sicle street you were tough always and when i knew you , when i
went on tour you still had game. you could bowl on most conditions becouse you
were accurate . i also agree that most action bowlers including myself were
gamblers and always wanted more and never knew when to quit. I remember pappas
betting me in N.C once that i could not shoot 220 and i beat him 3 straight. he
quit so i said how about 230 he said 235 i won the first lost 4 straight and
ended up 100 dollars down. you gotta know when to hold em and when to fold em.
say hello to cathy and stay well.
Mylenki stunk. What were you watching? Ernie used him to get easy matches. Lemon and ritchie would have beat him blindfolded. guess you forgot the night richie destroyed Godman a great Pba bowler. you also forgot that ernie did beat richie once or twice because he bowled him after Richie was tired. richie would walk in at 12 in central, ernie never came in before three. Then richie started walking in at 3, rested and ernie never beat him again.
pete mylenki could bowl,ernie and pete bowled mike and tom betucci on 37&38 in central and cleaned their clock,they also on another nite bowled ralph& doc iandolli and each game came down to the tenth and pete was like ice, what made ernie the best was he knew talent and when a match was in his favor,what made mike,richie, and quite a few others not as good(i didn't say talent)the never knew when to quit or if they had the best of the match they just wanted to bowl ernie was there for the kill and each time he bowled with pete they won. pete on the other hand was just like mike and richie,but the best was ralph ,ernie beat him 3 times ralph beat him 2 times,but you ask him today and he'll tell you ralph, not mike or ritchie,or anybody else............period......the best.....
Ernie did beat richie at central in the beginning because he was smarter. he would come at 3 am and challenge richie. he beat him because richie was there at 1am and already bowling and by the time the match got started the horn was tired. after a few times, the horn started showing up at 3am, rested and ernie never beat him again. I will admit that ernie was the best for my money because I never walked out a loser betting on him in the back. He had so many easy matches. As for ritchie, i could never get a bet in the back because everybody knew richie was the best. one night ernie beat mike chuchillo 7 out of 8 at central. to get chuchillo on the lanes, richie would have needed to spot him at least ten. you need to speak to schlegel one day and he will tell you that richie and lemon were much better. if you still believe schlegel was better then you forgot that whenever the horn and schlegel bowled doubles, richie was ALWAYS anchor. WHY? Because he never missed when it counted. enuf already.
After 10 years on the Senior tour, Schlegel is a champion: PBA Senior: Northern California Classic - PRO Tour ResultsIt took 10 years, but PBA Hall-of-Famer Ernie Schlegel finally won his first Senior tour title when he captured the PBA Senior Northern California Classic at Harvest Park Bowl. Schlegel defeated top qualifier Norb Wetzel, 2-0, for the $8,000 winner's prize. "It's been a long time coming," Schlegel said of his 55-tournament dry spell. "But it took me 12 years to win my first title on the PBA tour, so I guess I'm two years ahead of schedule here." Schlegel, 60, converted the difficult 3-9-10 split in the 10th frame of game No. 1 and set the tone with a 221-203 win. "I had to throw a back-up ball to convert it," he said. "That got in Wetzel's head. When you're bowling the best-of-three, that first game is so important. His shot just got worse from that point." Wetzel, a lefthander, played the far outside line while Schlegel, a righthander, played the same angle on the right. Schlegel won the deciding game 214-179. Wetzel earned $4,100 for his second-place performance. Northern California Classic June 11, 2003 Harvest Park Bowl, Brentwood, Calif. Rank, Name Avg./Games Earnings 1. Ernie Schlegel 218.4/5 $8,000 2. Norb Wetzel 201/4 4,100 3. Dave Soutar 198.3/3 2,500 4. Guppy Troup 192/2 2,500 Championship Finals Semifinal Schlegel def. Soutar 2-1 Semifinal Wetzel def. Troup 2-0 Final Schlegel def. Wetzel 2-0 http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0FCK/is_4_21/ai_107835430
|
||||